USGBC issues an interpretation of the LEED v4 credit
J
John Geyer
started a topic
almost 4 years ago
On April 5, 2016, the US Green Building Council issued an
interpretation of the LEED v4 credit, Building Product Disclosure and Optimization—Material
Ingredients, Option 1, that includes clarification of how the Health Product
Declaration 2.0 can be used to meet the requirements of the credit (http://www.usgbc.org/node/10149113). The interpretation confirms use of the Nested
Materials and Substances format, with thresholds stated for each material, and
the Basic Inventory format, with thresholds stated for the product as a
whole. It also adds a new compliance
alternative, based on the Nested Materials and Substances format, with
thresholds based on the product as a whole.
John Geyer
On April 5, 2016, the US Green Building Council issued an interpretation of the LEED v4 credit, Building Product Disclosure and Optimization—Material Ingredients, Option 1, that includes clarification of how the Health Product Declaration 2.0 can be used to meet the requirements of the credit (http://www.usgbc.org/node/10149113). The interpretation confirms use of the Nested Materials and Substances format, with thresholds stated for each material, and the Basic Inventory format, with thresholds stated for the product as a whole. It also adds a new compliance alternative, based on the Nested Materials and Substances format, with thresholds based on the product as a whole.
HPDC is updating guidance to reflect these changes. Guidance can be found on the HPDC website (http://www.hpd-collaborative.org/leed-v4-credit-achievement/).
3 people like this